May. 13, 2024
Hardware
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS
Ruiyi supply professional and honest service.
FIRST NAME
*
LAST NAME
*
*
MESSAGE
*
ADDITIONAL DETAILS
Thanks. We have received your request and will respond promptly.
Log In
Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.
Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Eng-Tips Posting Policies
Interview help - post tension design using hand calculations
5
thread507-415964 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPsForum
Search
FAQs
Links
MVPs
(Structural)
(OP)
19 Oct 16 23:27Hi, I am a attending an interview with a company which does Post tension work. The job position is 'Structural Engineer - Post Tension Design'. I was told by the recruitment agency that the company will do a technical round interview where i have to use hand calculation in post tension design. I have about 5 years experience as a structural engineer but never done post tension design. Can you please tell me the some question that I might be asked in 'Post tension design' and what sort of hand calculations i have to do. I am in UK, so please provide me some study materials based of BS/EURO code. Thank you.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 00:07In the UK you will need to be familiar with the Concrete Society Technical Report No. 43: Post-tensioned concrete floors.
(Structural)
(OP)
20 Oct 16 00:29Thanks mate.. any particular questions you can think of?
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 00:34Not meaning to judge but it seems like you're applying for a job you're not currently qualified for. While you can certainly learn on the job and study outside of work, do you feel you're able to take on the responsibilities they'll be needing from you?I'd learn about jacking procedures, transfer design stages, and prestressing losses; to name a few problems they may ask. Some other aspects might be various steps in checking capacity or whether the member remains uncracked. I'm familiar with the US codes so I can't help with any specifics beyond just generalizations.
Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 00:53At an job interview (many decades ago when I had about 3 or 4 years of grad experience) with a PT company in their design branch/office, I recall being asked by their chief engineer to discuss the steps to design a PT flat slab (nothing too difficult: selection of slab thickness, check punching shear, select load to balance, flexure, deflection etc), and then hand calculate the 'balanced load' for a given tendon drape and prestress force for an internal span of a beam. I had done 2 or so courses of undergrad prestressed concrete subjects at uni so they questions were not really a big deal.
I got the job, but I will say that it was "balls to the wall" upon starting on the first day. Thrown some interesting, multiple, fast-paced projects in the first week!
Not wanting to turn you off - but if you do go past the interview phase and land the job, I am going to assume it will be fast-paced from the get-go. If you don't have the fundamental basic understanding of PT, they may not be willing to slow down and train/mentor you.
Design software has (unfortunately?) changed a few things over the years, on what you can 'get away with' on assumed-knowledge.
Did you take a class at uni on prestressed concrete?
Are you in AU or the UK?
(Structural)
(OP)
20 Oct 16 01:06Thanks Ingenuity, i was working in the UK, i just moved to Aus and post tension jobs seem to be very hot here.
I understand the risks of a new job, but i can either sit at home dreaming about an ideal job Or work hard and make use of a given opportunity. Hopefully i should be able to manage will try to study what you have mentioned..
any particular study material u propose other than TR43 (Concrete Society Technical Report No. 43: Post-tensioned concrete floors)?
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 01:21 sparta7963,1. Prestressed Concrete, 3rd Edition. Robert Warner, Ken Faulkes, Stephen Forster,
2. Design of Prestressed Concrete to AS3600-2009, Second Edition, Raymond Ian Gilbert, Neil Colin Mickleborough, Gianluca Ranzi
Since you are currently in AU I would grab a copy of one or both of the following AU underdrad text books on prestressed concrete:Available from most uni bookshops.Even if you get an older 2nd-hand copy of Warner/Faulkes book (late 80's or early 90's edition I think), that has some good practical design info that will be an advantage to you at minimal cost.The second text does a better treatment of the theoretical aspects of prestressed concrete (especially creep, shrinkage, deflection etc), but the first text has some good info for practical design of slabs and beams: step-by-step procedures and design examples.And forget about UNbonded PT - AU is all bonded/grouted PT.All the very best to you.Also - if you want a heads-up on PT software in AU - most (all?) consulting companies in AU (and beyond) use RAPT ( www.raptsoftware.com ) and if you go to their website I think there is a trial download where you can take it for a spin. The author and owner of RAPT visits here at Eng-Tips frequently, so hopefully he will chip in too.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 03:24In your first post you said you were in the UK but now you are saying you are in Australia? If you are in Australia then TR43 is not in wide use although it is still worthwhile to read through.
The RAPT manual is a good resource (all 740 pages of it!). There is good discussion on preliminary sizing, load balancing and level of prestress in the beginning of the "Theory" section.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 03:52Sorry, I am with TehMightyEngineer on this one. if you have absolutely no idea on how to do PT design, bluffing them into thinking you do is not the way to go in my opinion. If they know what they are doing, they will pick it very quickly and then you have no chance.
If you really understand concrete design, convince them of that. The step up to PT design is not that large if you understand engineering, structures and concrete design (and I mean understand, not just know how to design an RC slab using software). By all means read the books to get started, but I would be honest. They will not expect many people coming from Europe to have much building PT experience.
(Structural)
(OP)
20 Oct 16 09:17thanks for the honest reply guys. I have around 5 years of experience in reinforced concrete and steel structures and i have mostly done multi-storey residential buildings, some industrial buildings and warehouse structures. I am not very experienced with PT design but however the job requirement is not very high i guess, more like they are expecting a candidate with 1-3 years of experience.
From what I have seen in my job hunting, australian companies don't consider or value your experience outside australia (that what the ALL the job recruitment consultants told me and the salary offered for that position was between AUD$60000 - $70000). So i am guessing its more of a junior level position.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 12:41I feel that the obligations of the employer and candidate here are as follows:Employer: vet you to ensure that they're getting what they need.Candidate: chase down your dreams with as much courage and tenacity as you can muster.If I could somehow convince NASA to hire me to train for the next manned space flight, would I give it a go? Darn right.Must the next prime minister have previous experience being prime minister? Of course not. Many jobs are learned on the job. Meaningful personal growth usually requires reaching a little.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 12:50TR43 would seem to be the best place to start. If you google VSL + post-tensioned concrete, you'll find a number of free - and relatively short - design brief documents. If you've got a bit a time to prepare, I'd recommend TY Lin's text. It's reasonably short and great for the fundamentals. It also has a number of simple examples.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Mechanical)
20 Oct 16 15:40 http://www.ptia.org.au/Downloads.aspx(Structural)
20 Oct 16 18:27Isn't it all just P/A plus or minus Mc/I, and knowing at what times certain stresses apply? (Consider this an interview level response).
(Aerospace)
20 Oct 16 18:32my 2c, don't over-sell yourself, but it's really good to show you've done some prep work ..."I haven't done any PT projects, but I have reviewed some technical references ..."I'd be interested in when to use PT beams, and why (are they used in those situations).
another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 21:17I haven't read through the other replies (other than noting you've gotten some good technical advice) so pardon me if this has been said before but: whatever you do, be darn sure they understand what you can and can't do. It's one thing for them to quiz you or whatever.....but make clear: "Hey, however I did on the quiz, this is my first time at bat with post-tension design."
You just want them aware of your experience level......especially if they want you to come in and immediately stamp stuff (you may not be comfortable with that).
One of the best jobs I ever had was when I told the guy in the interview: "Your ad asked for [this or that skill]....here are some of those skills I have: [ ], and here are some I don't have: [ ]."
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 21:28Quote (WARose)
and immediately stamp stuff
That won't be an issue - there is no PE/SE stamping in AU, per se.Stamping/sealing is a somewhat unique North American "restrictive trade practice".
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 21:36Quote (rb1957)
I'd be interested in when to use PT beams, and why (are they used in those situations).
Is that you asking, rb?If so: Typically, PT (and prestressing generally) is used to 1) accommodate larger spans at 2) less structural depth than non-prestressed members, with 3) superior deflection control due to the active 'actions' of eccentricity/curvature of the prestressing tendons, and 4) less cracking due to the effective P/A. Also good for fatigue resistance too - more appropriate for bridges than buildings.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 21:37+1 for the RAPT manual. Great reference, but it doesn't cover it all. Do some research on load balancing and Hall's graphical method.Coming more from the practical perspective, I highly recommend downloading the material available from the Post Tensioning Institute of Australia.In particular the 'Practical Prestress Detailing' guide. I've attached it for anyone too lazy to click the link.
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 21:46And don't EVER do this!
(Structural)
20 Oct 16 21:53Been a while since I've seen that classic ^^
(Structural)
For more information, please visit post tension system solutions.
Featured content:That image would actually make a great interview question; "what's wrong with this picture?".
Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries
www.americanconcrete.com
(Structural)
21 Oct 16 22:39At least the stressing end is shown on the right side
(Structural)
22 Oct 16 03:49almost always terminated the strand at the kern point to account for some -ve moment and to increase the sag a tad.
(Structural)
22 Oct 16 21:45Dik
OK for an increase the negative moment capacity, but you also increase your negative moment due to secondary prestress effects, and you are also applying an end moment which completely negates the extra uplift and does nothing to help with deflections or service stresses at mid-span.
Further on the negative side, if the member is not deep enough you are creating congestion problems at the top with anchorages needing to fit in with transverse tendons and reinforcement in both directions.
So unless you really need the extra negative moment capacity (which you normally do not, as I would always add some passive top reinforcement at end columns anyway), don't waste your time.
(Structural)
1 Nov 16 11:55agreed to some extent... and add regular reinforcing as noted... running the sums it does improve things a bit... just take advantage of the added sag in the end span.
thanks, Dik
(Structural)
2 Nov 16 01:55What is the added sag doing for you, after you take into account the added end moment which completely negates the extra uplift from the added sag?
(Structural)
2 Nov 16 15:26I don't have any experience in PT, could someone clarify what is wrong with the picture? Thanks!
(Structural)
2 Nov 16 16:57Prestressing tendons experience tension losses due to anchor seating, relaxation, elastic shortening, creep etc. With very short tendons, those losses decrease the prestress to the point that the prestressing ceases to add meaningful benefit to the system. It can also be a bit tricky to jack short tendons accurately as small increments of end stretch produce relatively large increments of tendon force (d = PL/AE).
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Structural)
2 Nov 16 22:54Quote (dik)
almost always terminated the strand at the kern point to account for some -ve moment and to increase the sag a tad.
Quote (rapt)
What is the added sag doing for you, after you take into account the added end moment which completely negates the extra uplift from the added sag?
Whatrefers can be easily understood for a simplistic case of a simply supported beam with end eccentricities ABOVE the CGS. Such end eccentricities makes the midspan deflection worse (less uplift), as per the attached two cases, where I just rearranged 5wL/384EI and P(e+e)L/8EI for midspan displacements, under the actions due to prestress due to wand end-eccentricity of prestress, respectively.The PL/48EI term is making the midspan uplift LESS compared to CASE II with the same prestress, less "sag", yet with no end eccentricity.
(Structural)
3 Nov 16 02:38Thanks... fully understood...
Dik
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 00:19Ingenuity,
Nice pictures. Wish I could do that!
In Case 1, the drape is e1 + e2, not e1, so the balanced load deflection is 5PL^2(e1 + e2)/48EI.
After subtracting off the end moment effect, Case 1 result is 5PL^2(e1)/48EI, exactly the same as Casse 11.
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 00:33I was curious too so I did a little fact checking myself last night ('tis the season). Turns out Inginuity is fit to lead the free world after all. Or at lest design a little PT.Excuse the quality. I wan't originally intended for public consumption.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 00:48 rapt - just some mathematical 'gymnastics' to get the reduced form. See below.Quote (KootK)
Inginuity
- just some mathematical 'gymnastics' to get the reduced form. See below.- your 'thumb-nail-dipped-in-tar' presentation is as good as your spelling, but that's ok,are not here on this earth to look good or be great spellers - well at least I'm not!
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 00:52Quote (rapt)
Nice pictures. Wish I could do that!
I did a FEM analysis too - want to see that? Just kidding
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 00:55I'm actually a first rate speller. I'm just usually doing this on my phone and correcting the autocorrects isn't worth the effort. Even so, I've gotta be in the upper 50% round here with respect to readability.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 00:59Quote (Ingenuity)
I did a FEM analysis too - want to see that? Just kidding winky smile
If you've already got it prepped then... yeah. I think that midspan moments do come out a tie.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 01:02Sorry Ingenuity, I had always assumed it exactly cancelled the increased uplift effect and commented before looking into the derivation. But looking into the math you are correct, it actually makes your deflection slightly worse, contrary to some designers expectations.
Which would explain why lowering the tendon at the anchorage below the centroid in a simply supported span (and the reverse in a cantilever), reducing the "drape uplift" but introducing a beneficial set of end moments, actually helps reduce deflections.
This is one of the reasons I have always tried to talk designers out of thinking in terms of load balancing. They tend to think of the drape effect only and not the "secondary profiling effects" (as distinct from Secondary Prestress (parasitic moment)) like moments from end eccentricities. "Moment Balancing" is a much safer concept!
Some early PT programs used to actually make those incorrect assumptions regarding raising end eccentricities, even one developed by a PT company you used to work for in Sydney which was taken to America by an employee and has developed and been used extensively in the USA.
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 01:07KootK,
Yes, with a determinate member, the mid span moment is P * e1 no matter what!
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 07:41Quote (rapt)
Sorry Ingenuity
Quote (rapt)
Which would explain why lowering the tendon at the anchorage below the centroid in a simply supported span (and the reverse in a cantilever), reducing the "drape uplift" but introducing a beneficial set of end moments, actually helps reduce deflections.
Quote (KootK)
If you've already got it prepped then... yeah.
No worries.Yep, even if you consider a prestressed plank (and ignore strand end-slip etc) with straight strand of constant eccentricity, e, [CASE III below] there is 20% more midspan uplift than a parabolic drape of e'sag' with the same prestress [CASE II]:No, I didn't do a FE analysis. But I concur withwith a midspan moment of P*e
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 11:45I find it interesting to consider this in terms of "balancing moment" as rapt suggested. With the extreme tendon position a given, the peak of that moment diagram is unaffected by the tendon disposition elsewhere.What is affected by the tendon disposition elsewhere is the total area under the moment diagram and, by extension, the total area under the curvature diagram and, ultimately, deflection. Since a level tendon profile msximizes the area under the moment diagram, it makes sense that arrangement would maximize deflection.So, if one were to design a cantilever with the singular goal of inducing upwards tip deflection, the best strategy would be to:1) Raise the end anchorage as much as possible.2) Use a concave down parabola to get from the end anchorage elevation to the support tendon elevation.Both of these things because they "fatten" the moment diagram. But, then, we typically do neither of these things in conventional design for a number of practical reasons.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
(Structural)
4 Nov 16 20:56There is no way that you will be able to teach yourself p.t. design sufficiently make this prospective employer think you know p.t. - and ethically speaking, you should not try to pass yourself off as being proficient at something you have no experience with. A better solution would be to make the case that you are an intelligent engineer who is eager to learn new things and is self-motivated. (Your message speaks to your eagerness to learn p.t. design.) I think the things most employers look for when hiring new engineers are things that cannot be taught - and eagerness to learn, a willingness and ability to communicate, a good work ethic, a genuine passion for structural engineering and an intelligence and curiosity about the way things work. Teaching p.t. someone how to design p.t. is easy - those other things are not.
(Structural)
5 Nov 16 01:22Kootk,
Yes, the best for deflection. But when pushed too far you start causing transfer stress problems!
If he was alive today, poor old TY Lin would not like our conclusions regarding Load Balancing vs Moment Balancing, but Leonhardt and Guyon surely would.
Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login
Concrete
Post-tension Slab Checklist
copyright 2007 Marshall Hansen
Scope/contract issues
Pre-pour
Pour
Post pour/finishing
After you discover the plumber, electrician, other sub or architect/engineer omitted a sleeve, conduit, anchor, piling, footing, whatever and now have to break the slab to replace, install, remove, repair, etc – what shall I do?
Tendon Repair
Did you attempt to repair plumbing, electrical, sleeves without calling the lab for a locate, find a broken tendon after a sub installed a tub, anchor plate, etc? The slab is over-engineered and depending on the location of the broken tendon a repair may not be required. This is a decision only the PT engineer can make. Prepare an RFI with the location clearly described and marked on a tendon layout diagram from the plans, ask if repair is necessary then send RFI and follow RFI response instructions.
If repair is required coordinate with repair tech and determine what prep work is needed to complete the job.
Check revision date for updates. Work safe.
Marshall
More
Like
Loading...
Contact us to discuss your requirements of bulk supply post tension anchor. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
Previous: PEEK vs PEK vs PTFE
If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!
All Comments ( 0 )