Hong Kong's e-bike crackdown could spark food delivery ...

Seven Running Product Page

11th November &#; (Hong Kong) In the narrow streets of Tsim Sha Tsui, where 76% of delivery riders have embraced electric bicycles despite their illegal status, Hong Kong&#;s latest crackdown on Electric Mobility Devices (EMDs) threatens to upend the delicate balance between urban convenience and regulatory compliance. The government&#;s proposed framework, limiting EMDs to designated cycling tracks while excluding them from roads entirely, presents a profound challenge to the city&#;s burgeoning food delivery ecosystem.

The dichotomy between regulatory intent and operational reality has never been starker. While the Transport Department meticulously crafts technical specifications for legal EMDs &#; including maximum speeds of 25 km/h and precise dimensional requirements &#; delivery platforms face an existential challenge. Their current business model, built on the promise of rapid delivery times, relies heavily on the very vehicles the government seeks to restrict.

The implications of this regulatory squeeze extend far beyond simple logistics. For platforms like Deliveroo, Foodpanda, and KEETA, whose business models hinge on the promise of 30-minute deliveries, the restriction of EMDs to cycling tracks presents an almost impossible operational puzzle. The mathematics of urban delivery becomes particularly challenging when considering that Hong Kong&#;s dedicated cycling infrastructure exists primarily in new towns, far from the dense urban cores where food delivery demand concentrates.

Current statistics paint a telling picture. With over three-quarters of delivery cyclists in key districts like Tsim Sha Tsui already utilizing electric bikes, the scale of potential disruption becomes clear. These riders have embraced e-bikes not out of defiance but necessity &#; the devices allow for longer working hours, reduced physical strain, and crucially, faster delivery times in Hong Kong&#;s challenging topography.

The government&#;s proposed regulatory framework, while well-intentioned in its focus on safety, appears disconnected from the practical realities of urban logistics. The stipulation that EMDs can only operate on designated cycling tracks effectively renders them useless for most food delivery operations. Major commercial districts like Central, Wan Chai, and Tsim Sha Tsui lack such infrastructure entirely, yet generate the bulk of delivery orders.

Industry insiders predict a likely scenario of continued civil disobedience, with riders adopting a &#;catch me if you can&#; approach to enforcement. This creates a precarious situation where delivery platforms must balance their public commitment to regulatory compliance against the practical impossibility of maintaining service levels without EMD use. The arrest statistics &#; 267 riders in alone &#; suggest that enforcement efforts have done little to deter what has become an economic necessity.

The technical specifications proposed for legal EMDs further complicate matters. While the 25 km/h speed limit and dimensional restrictions might suit recreational users, they fail to address the specific needs of commercial delivery operations. The distinction between pedal-assisted power cycles and throttle-controlled e-bikes &#; the latter preferred by delivery riders for their efficiency &#; creates another layer of complexity in enforcement and compliance.

Food delivery platforms find themselves in an increasingly untenable position. Their business models, optimised around rapid delivery times, face disruption from regulations that effectively mandate a return to purely human-powered transportation in urban cores. The alternative &#; limiting operations to areas with proper cycling infrastructure &#; would effectively abandon their most lucrative markets.

The economic implications ripple beyond just the platforms. For riders, many of whom have invested in their own EMDs, the regulations threaten their livelihoods. A typical e-bike allows a rider to complete more deliveries with less physical exertion, translating directly into higher earnings. Forcing a return to traditional bicycles could make the profession economically unviable for many, particularly in Hong Kong&#;s hilly terrain.

Consumer expectations present another challenge. Hong Kong&#;s food delivery market has evolved around the promise of rapid service, with customers accustomed to receiving their orders within 30 minutes. The removal of EMDs from urban roads would necessarily extend these delivery times, potentially undermining customer satisfaction and platform viability.

Current market behaviour suggests a brewing collision between regulation and reality. While platforms publicly support safety initiatives, their operations continue to rely heavily on EMD-equipped riders. This tacit acceptance of illegal vehicle use reflects the absence of viable alternatives under the proposed regulatory framework. The government&#;s safety concerns are not unfounded. The proliferation of unregulated EMDs presents genuine risks, particularly given the variable quality of modifications and maintenance observed in the field. However, the current regulatory approach risks creating a permanent grey market where necessity forces widespread non-compliance.

A more nuanced approach might consider creating special provisions for commercial delivery operations, similar to how other jurisdictions have handled the rise of e-commerce logistics. This could include designated urban routes, rider certification programs, and specific technical standards for delivery EMDs.

The experience of other Asian cities offers potential lessons. Singapore, for instance, has successfully integrated EMDs into its urban transport mix through a combination of infrastructure investment and targeted regulation. Tokyo has created specific zones where delivery EMDs can operate legally, balancing safety concerns with commercial necessity.

The resolution of this conflict will likely shape not just food delivery but urban logistics more broadly. As e-commerce continues to grow, the need for efficient last-mile delivery solutions becomes ever more pressing. The current EMD regulations, focused primarily on recreational use, may need to evolve to accommodate the commercial realities of modern urban life. For now, the food delivery platforms continue their delicate balance, publicly endorsing safety while privately grappling with the impossibility of their position. The true test will come with enforcement, as the industry discovers whether Hong Kong&#;s appetite for convenience outweighs its regulatory caution.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website Electric Bicycles.

Five Hong Kong men have been arrested over allegedly driving electric bicycles and scooters on the road illegally.

Hong Kong police make five arrests on November 13, in an operation to crack down on illegal use of electric mobility devices. Photo: Hong Kong Police.

Five men aged between 34 and 63 were arrested in Kwun Tong, Sau Mau Ping and Tseung Kwan O on Wednesday in a police operation to crack down on the illegal use of electric mobility devices in the city. A total of three electric bikes and two scooters were confiscated.

The arrestees were suspected of driving an unregistered vehicle, operating a motorcycle on a pedestrian walkway, driving without a valid driving licence, using a vehicle without third-party insurance and failing to wear an approved protective helmet while driving.

The five men were released on bail pending investigation. They have to report to the police in mid-December.

&#;Police reiterate that electric mobility devices should not be used on the same roads as regular vehicles and are not suitable for pedestrian walkways or bicycle paths,&#; police said in a Chinese statement on Wednesday.

Hong Kong police make five arrests on November 13, in an operation to crack down on illegal use of electric mobility devices. Photo: Hong Kong Police.

The use of electric mobility devices, such as electric scooters, electric hoverboards and electric unicycles, are currently banned in Hong Kong under the Road Traffic Ordinance and its subsidiary legislation.

Individuals who use such devices on carriageways, footpaths or cycle tracks may commit a criminal offence and those convicted could face a maximum fine of HK$10,000 and up to one year behind bars.

The police arrested 267 people in for illegal use of electric devices, according to data from the Transport Department. The number of arrests in and were 207 and 236, respectively.

The long-standing policy of the Hong Kong government has been to not register or license electric mobility devices under the existing ordinance because of the varied quality of unregulated devices, the Transport Department wrote in a paper submitted to the Legislative Council (LegCo) in June .

Hong Kong police make five arrests on November 13, in an operation to crack down on illegal use of electric mobility devices. Photo: Hong Kong Police.

The document pointed to 72 accidents involving such devices over the past four years, resulting in six casualties. There were also concerns over safety, especially in relation to the quality of batteries in electric mobility devices, which may leak and overheat and cause fire.

The government said last June that it would commence a legislative amendment exercise on electric mobility devices. So far, no amendment has been submitted to the legislature for scrutiny.

In June, the Transport Department said the government was formulating proper regulatory arrangements for electric mobility devices to ensure their safe and effective use, while allowing more room for the adoption of new technologies and innovation. 

Hong Kong police make five arrests on November 13, in an operation to crack down on illegal use of electric mobility devices. Photo: Hong Kong Police.

The authorities proposed categorising the devices into personal mobility devices, such as electric scooters, motorised skateboards, electric unicycles, and power assisted pedal cycles, referring to bicycles or tricycles that were equipped with an auxiliary electric motor and motorised assistance.

The department said it was considering the views of relevant government departments and stakeholders and making drafts of the amendments. The proposed legislative changes would be submitted to the LegCo in due course, it said.

Support HKFP  |  Policies & Ethics  |  Error/typo?  |  Contact Us  |  Newsletter  | Transparency & Annual Report | Apps

Help safeguard press freedom & keep HKFP free for all readers by supporting our team

Want more information on Scooter Manufacturing? Feel free to contact us.